Market Perform; Simos Simeonidis, Ph.D.
Senior Biotechnology Analyst
Synta cuts 42% of workforce; waiting for strategic alternatives guidance
The News: Synta announced today a 42% reduction in its workforce, laying off 90 employees, in an effort to preserve its cash balance, following the failure of the Phase III melanoma trial with Elescomol, the company’s only late stage program.
Our view: This was an anticipated and absolutely necessary first step, given that the company’s most valuable and tangible asset is their cash position, and it would make no sense to continue spending like a Phase III company with a big Pharma partner, given the Elescomol failure in melanoma and the uncertainty around the future of the GlaxoSmithKline partnership (GSK, Not Rated).
What’s next for Synta? 1) An analysis of the data on what may have caused the imbalance of deaths will occur in the upcoming weeks, 2) GSK’s decision on whether to give the compound back to Synta and end the partnership or continue its development and 3) the company’s guidance on what its plans are going forward in terms of strategic alternatives.
Our view on what’s coming up: It would be mere conjecture to attempt to speculate on what may have caused the excess deaths in the patients treated with Elescomol. We believe however that it is highly unlikely that we will see further development on Elescomol in melanoma, or in other solid tumors, given the excess deaths observed in the Phase III trial.
Assuming Elescomol is finished, what does Synta look like now? Given that the analysis of the data from the trial has not yet been completed, we believe there is always a small theoretical chance (we would estimate it at no more than 5%), that following the analysis of the full dataset from the trial, an explanation could arise that could exonerate Elescomol for its role in the excess deaths in the trial and that could thus justify further development of the compound. However, we believe that this possibility is miniscule and believe that Elesclomol’s development is over. Assuming this is the case, we are taking a look at Synta’s remaining assets:
1. Cash: Between $75M or ~$2/share as of today ($65-$70M at YE08, plus $16M from Roche, $10M from GlaxoSmithKline, minus ~$15-$20 we assume has already been spent in ’09), but with significant burn in order to further develop any other of their compounds.
2. The Roche (RHHBY, Not Rated) partnership (CRACM inhibitors): This program is certainly interesting having received some validation through the Roche partnership and could potentially be significant in a few years, but it is still a high-risk discovery effort, and thus too early to assign any significant value to in terms of share price. This is especially true in the current market environment, when investors assign little value to even late stage programs.
3. Apilimod: enrolling a Phase IIa for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
4. Hsp90 inhibitor (STA-9090): currently enrolling two Phase I trials in solid tumors, but facing a potentially crowded development space with other more advanced Hsp90 inhibitors, including Infinity’s IPI-504 (INFI, Market Outperform) and BMS' Tanespimycin (BMY, Not Rated).
Maintaining our Market Perform Rating: Based on the recent developments, i.e. the end (for all practical purposes) of the company’s only advanced program, and since the only value near-term we see in the shares is in the company’s cash position, which we estimate at about $2/share, we view SNTA shares as fairly valued and maintaining our Market Perform rating.